DBP has many great strengths, they may not be the strengths which you are looking for but they are what makes DBP one of the most widely used 3D engine/language today. My second irritation about DBP is a universal complaint about it's disappointing, swiss-cheese-like documentation, riddled with errata and sorely lacking. If the current version of DBP were given a fair shake, they might be eating their words. One of the things that I currently hate about DBP is it's public skepticism which is often times dished out by under-informed and bias individuals. Currently I very much love DBP, I was not so impressed during the 5.x days of DBP and rightly so. I have seen it progress from version 5x to current 6.6 and with it many improvements. I have been using DBP for ~3 years now and have been a member of it's community for more than 2. I have a Love-Hate relationship with Dark Basic Pro.
#DARK BASIC PRO DOWNLAOD PROFESSIONAL#
Most of the bugs in long-standing bugs in DarkBasic Professional were fixed then and even more are continuing to be fixed.
Can't you appreciate the value of that? If you don't like DarkBasic please move and stop crapping in my thread.įor those of you unfamiliar with U6 The Game Creators worked directly with the community on a massive bug-athon which squished bugs daily. I'm porting a complete and very capable 3D engine to PureBasic. If so many of you pride DarkGDK then why not PureGDK? It works with PureBasic! DarkGDK is not updated more than DarkBasic Professional. It uses the same engine and is neither better or worse. DarkGDK is not any more stable than DarkBasic Professional other than the fact that it does not suffer from the language bugs, like which PureGDK.
0 kommentar(er)
